Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K560Q vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA GRID K560Q vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K560Q and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K560Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K560Q
2.289 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +751%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
GRID
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1536
Shading Units
6912
128
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy