Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1395MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +261%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
2304
288
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK110B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy