Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
12.86 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +14%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
8192
288
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy