Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1550MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +43%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2012
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy