Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +14%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy