Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S9170

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +119%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jul 2015
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy