Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1590MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +19%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jul 2020
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
80W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy