Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro W8000

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +35%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy