CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9350
Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9350
VS
Intel H3C XG310
AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+18%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
VS
FireStream 9350
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2
Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
3
Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R9 285
4
Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V4800
5
Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2
6
Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro D700
7
Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
8
Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 DDR4
9
Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI Radeon X550 XT
10
Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy