Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+18%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1440
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
