Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1550MHz vs 1239MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +87%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2015
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.94 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy