Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1550MHz vs 1243MHz)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +140%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1188 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
200W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy