Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (300W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1720MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo +491%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2019
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.23 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
475W
700 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy