Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2600MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +1241%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
190W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
28.1 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy