Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1550MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +377%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
H3C Graphics
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy