Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2175MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +1022%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
20GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
768
Shading Units
6144
48
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
130W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
35.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy