Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A
+731%
122.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
14592
256
TMUs
880
128
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
760W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
