Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +544%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy