Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +205%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy