Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000
+10%
16.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
8192
Shading Units
4608
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
260W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
