CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+3314%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro 3000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
2
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
6
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Related News
1
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
2
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
3
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
4
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
5
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
6
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
7
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
8
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
9
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
10
Elon Musk Responds to Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: Humanoid Robots Will Be Ten Times More Common than Cars
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy