Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2934%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
8192
Shading Units
256
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
142W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
