Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA A10G

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Boost Clock1710MHz
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
A10G +113%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
8192
Shading Units
9216
256
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy