Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +4090%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy