Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2271%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
