Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +405%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2.918 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.60 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.918 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
18W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy