Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +224%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
8192
Shading Units
14080
256
TMUs
880
128
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy