CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+224%
47.87 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
14080
256
TMUs
880
128
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Instinct MI300A
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy