CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+224%
47.87 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
8192
Shading Units
14080
256
TMUs
880
128
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
500W
TDP
500W
900 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
7
NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy