Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20s 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +413%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla K20s
2.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2496
256
TMUs
208
128
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.90 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.870 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
956.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy