NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 13W)
Score
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2007
Tegra
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
-
921 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Bearlake
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
20 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
