Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +1909%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
16
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy