Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +2204%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tegra
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy