Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +33%
0.64 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2011
Tegra
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.17 billion
Unknown
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy