CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1189%
8.253 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
VS
RTX A2000 Embedded
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
16
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
10W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
2
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
3
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d
5
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
6
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Jetson TX2 GPU
7
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
8
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
9
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
10
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy