Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +1189%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
16
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

10W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy