Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +1147%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2021
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
26
512
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
16
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12 billion
Unknown
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy