Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 260M +83%
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2009
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
38W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GT215
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy