Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4350 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 4350
0.072 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +17052%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
M9x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
80
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy