Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2010
M5x
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy