Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 vs AMD FirePro M4150

ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 vs AMD FirePro M4150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2500 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
M6x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
1.840 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

M66
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy