Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+104%
2.048 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
