Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel Arc A750

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Boost Clock2400MHz
Lower TDP (225W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +42%
24.58 TFLOPS
Arc A750
17.2 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
3584
512
TMUs
224
512
ROPs
112
128
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
225W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
22 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net