Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock1019MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +685%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2012
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
1536
512
TMUs
128
512
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
300W
850 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net