Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +2132%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
640
512
TMUs
40
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
80W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net