Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +808%
24.58 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
8192
Shading Units
768
512
TMUs
24
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
50W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net