Home GPU Comparison MTT S30 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

MTT S30 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM MTT S30 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S30 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1590MHz vs 1300MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S30
2.6 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +9%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Jul 2020
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
TMUs
56
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
80W
W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

SuDi
GPU Name
TU116
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
MUSA
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy