Home GPU Comparison MTT S50 vs ATI FirePro V3800

MTT S50 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM MTT S50 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
1648 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S50 +900%
5.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
400
TMUs
20
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.2 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
43W
W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

SuDi
GPU Name
Redwood
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
MUSA
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy