Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs ATI FireGL V8650

MTT S80 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +3172%
14.4 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Aug 2007
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
SM Count
-
4096
Shading Units
320
TMUs
16
ROPs
16
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

255W
TDP
Unknown
350 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
R600
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
MUSA
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
Unknown
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy