Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs ATI FirePro V3800

MTT S80 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 255W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +2669%
14.4 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
SM Count
-
4096
Shading Units
400
TMUs
20
ROPs
8
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

255W
TDP
43W
350 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
Redwood
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
MUSA
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy