Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs AMD FireStream 9270

MTT S80 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 255W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +1100%
14.4 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
SM Count
-
4096
Shading Units
800
TMUs
40
ROPs
16
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

255W
TDP
160W
350 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
RV770
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
MUSA
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
-
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy