Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

MTT S80 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 255W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +226%
14.4 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Nov 2019
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
1280
TMUs
80
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

255W
TDP
100W
350 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
TU116
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
MUSA
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy