Home GPU Comparison MTT S80 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

MTT S80 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM MTT S80 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 255W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S80 +660%
14.4 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Feb 2014
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
SM Count
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
TMUs
64
ROPs
32
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

255W
TDP
150W
350 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
CPU 8Pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

ChunXiao
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
MUSA
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy