Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +6202%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy